← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41931/2022allowed

Agay Bhushan Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-07Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41931 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-690 Year-2018 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Jamui ====================================================== Agay Bhushan Mishra Son of Late Chandrakant Mishra Resident of Village - Kumardih, P.S.- Khaira, District - Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Mintu Kumar Son of Krishnadev Sharma Resident of Village - Keshopur, P.O.- Jhajha, District - Jamui.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 07-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Complainant Case No. 690(C)/ 2018 instituted for the offence under Sections 467, 468, 471, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegations against the petitioner are of cheating and making forgery in the revenue record.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has got no criminal antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in this case due to previous enmity. It is further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41931 of 2022(2) dt.07-12-2022 2/2 submitted that there was no chit of paper has been brought on record that the forgery has been committed in any document by the petitioner and no writing and signature of petitioner is available on any forged paper. Petitioner is a government servant and there is delay of more than six years for filing complaint.

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Complainant Case No. 690(C) of 2018, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jamui subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) amandeep/- U T