← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42257/2023dismissed

Maheshi Yadav @ Raghubans Ji @ Mahesh Yadav @ Raghubans v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-19Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42257 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2011 Thana- DUMARIYA District- Gaya ====================================================== MAHESHI YADAV @ RAGHUBANS JI @ MAHESH YADAV @ RAGHUBANS SON OF LATE MAKHU YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KATHAUTIA JHANJHI, PS- BARACHATTI, DISTRICTGAYA. AT PRESENT VILLAGE- KARAN BIGHA, PS- DOBHI, DISTRICT- GAYA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jai Narain Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 19-07-2023 Heard the parties.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 147, 148, 149, 353, 307 and 302 of the IPC, sections 25(1-B)A, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act and u/s 17 of the C.L.A. Act.

3.

Earlier, the prayer for grant of bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 05.10.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No.15069 of 2021 with direction to the trial court to conclude the trial within one year. At that time, the stage of the trial was that the record of absent accused person was ordered to be split up.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42257 of 2023(2) dt.19-07-2023 2/2 the order, it has come that the record of the absent accused person was ordered to be split up and sent to another Court on 17.04.2023 at the stage of evidence.

5.

Considering the fact that petitioner is a member of Naxal group and the nature of offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail is hereby rejected. 6.

Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed. 7.

However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T