Sanoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.34770 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -637 Year- 2016 Thana -BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBHAGALPUR ======================================================
1. Sanoj Yadav, Son of Dando Yadav, Resident of Village-Karela, P.s. Nathnagar (Madhusudanpur), District-Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Janki Nandan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-08-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kotwarli (Barari) P.S.Case No.637 of 2016 (g.R.No.3941 of 2016) registered for offences punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.
The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The case is under Section 395 of IPC. It also appears that he is accused in five other cases.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the other co-accused having similar allegation have already been granted bail by this Court, vide order dated 1.7.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No.28999 of 2017 and order dated 12.6.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No.22390 of 2017. The petitioner is in custody since 23.3.2017.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34770 of 2017 (2) dt.02-08-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Bhagalpur in connection with Kotwali (Barari) P.S.Case No.637 of 2016 (G.R.No.3941 o 2016). With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled. (iv) If his active participation is found in such type of cases in future, the trial court shall cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T