Amit Bhojpuriya v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45004 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -89 Year- 2007 Thana -BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Amit Bhojpuriya, Son of Satyendra Kumar Singh, Resident of VillageParghari, P.S. Sabour, District- Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner has been in custody since 16.04.2018 in connection with Kotwali (Barari) P.S. Case No. 89 of 2007 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/5 of the Explosive Substance Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was earlier granted bail, but for want of proper parvi in the Court as the petitioner had gone outside for earning his livelihood, his bail bonds was cancelled and he was taken into custody. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that he is willing to co-operate in the trial and shall appear on each and every date and the trial shall not be delayed on account of his absence and such act of not making Pairvi in the case, will not be repeated and he shall also abide the terms and conditions of this

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45004 of 2018 (3) dt.02-08-2018 2/2 Court.

In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 3rd A.D.J., Bhagalpur, in connection with Kotwali (Barari) P.S. Case No. 89 of 2007, subject to the following conditions:-

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or their wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T