Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42099/2023rejected

Ravi Ranjan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-05Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42099 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-447 Year-2021 Thana- RIVILGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== RAVI RANJAN SINGH S/O LATE BASHIST NARAYAN SINGH R/O VILLAGE- NAWADA, PS. RIVILGANJ, DIST. SARAN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 05-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 413, 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26/35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per prosecution case, there has been recovery of one stolen motorcycle, one loaded country-made pistol and two live cartridges from the possession of the petitioner.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. He submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this false case with ulterior motive on the basis of confessional statement recorded before the police. He is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42099 of 2023(3) dt.05-09-2023 2/2 languishing in judicial custody since 13.12.2021.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for bail and submitted that petitioner is named in the FIR. He further submitted that petitioner has apprehended on spot and from his possession a stolen motorcycle and other incriminating arms/cartridges have been recovered. Petitioner has got a huge criminal antecedents. During investigation several witnesses have also supported the prosecution case.

6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.

7. The trial Court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U