Ashok Kumar Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13236 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Ashok Kumar Yadav S/o Late Hari Narayan Yadav resident of Village - Sarojbela, P.S. - Marauna, District - Supaul.

2. Shiv Kumar Yadav S/o Late Mukti Yadav resident of Village - Tulsiahi, P.S. - Marauna, Distt - Supaul.

3. Chedi Mahto S/o Musehar Mahto resident of Village - Sisauni, P.S. - Marauna, Distt - Supaul.

4. Janardan Kamat S/o Bahadur Kamat resident of Village - Panchgachia, P.S. - Marauna, District - Supaul.

... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation through its Managing Director, Patna.

4. The Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, Patna.

5. The District Magistrate, Supaul.

6. The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, Supaul.

7. The Block Development Officer, Marauna, District - Supaul.

8. Managing Director, Bihar State Cooperative Bank, Head Office, Ashok Rajpath, Patna.

9. Branch Manager, Bihar State Cooperative Bank Bihat Branch, Begusarai. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kishore Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. V.K. Singh, GA3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 15-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner has approached this Court complaining of non-lifting of the paddy grown in Khariff Marketing Season 201112 by the Corporation. The scheme under which such procurement

Patna High Court CWJC No.13236 of 2015 (4) dt.15-02-2016 2/2 is prayed for has ended in 2012 and the petitioner has belatedly approached this Court after 3 years for the relief. No case for indulgence is made out.

The writ petition is disposed of.

(Jyoti Saran, J) Bibhash/- U