Imteyaz Ahmad v. Ashgari Khatoon
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL REVISION No.506 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Siwan ====================================================== Imteyaz Ahmad, S/O Late Nabi Hasan, Resident of village- Takiya Bankat, P.O. and P.S.- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
Ashgari Khatoon W/O Imteyaz Ahmad D/O Tunush Rahman Resident Of Village- Mahubal, P.O.- Badrum P.S.- Hussainganj District- Siwan 2.
Mohammad Sarfraz S/O Imteyaz Ahmad Resident Of Village- Mahubal, P.O.- Badrum P.S.- Hussainganj District- Siwan 3.
Mohammad Sahbaaz S/O Imteyaz Ahmad And Guardianship Of O.P No.1 Resident Of Village- Mahubal, P.O.- Badrum P.S.- Hussainganj DistrictSiwan 4.
Mohammad Sahdaab S/O Imteyaz Ahmad And Guardianship Of O.P No.1 Resident Of Village- Mahubal, P.O.- Badrum P.S.- Hussainganj DistrictSiwan ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Amir Alam, Advocate For the Respondents :
Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 31-07-2025 The present Criminal Revision Petition has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 21.04.2022, whereby the Petitioner has been directed to pay maintenance to the Opposite Party Nos. 1 to 4, who are wife and children of the Petitioner respectively.
2. However, the petition has been filed four days after expiry of the limitation as per the office notes. Even otherwise, I find that the impugned judgment is well discussed and reasoned and there is no infirmity in it.
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.506 of 2022(3) dt.31-07-2025 2/2
3. Hence, the present petition is dismissed as time barred, as no application for condonation of delay has been filed explaining the delay in filing the petition.
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the Petitioner informs that the Opposite Party Nos.2 & 3 have become major and they should not get maintenance.
5. Under such facts and circumstances, the Petitioner is at liberty to file appropriate application under Section 127 Cr.PC before the Family Court for modification of the impugned order in the light of the changed circumstances. (Jitendra Kumar, J.) Chandan/- U T