Manju Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6792 of 2011 ====================================================== Manju Kumari, W/O Shri Manoj Kumar, R/V-+P.O. Mohammadganj, Anchal + P.S.-Chhatapur, District-Supaul.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Koshi Commissionery, Saharsa.
4. The District Superintendent of Education, Supaul.
5. The Block Development Officer, Anchal + P. S.-Chhatapur, DistrictSupaul.
6. The Block Education Extension Officer, Anchal + P.S.-Chhatapur, District-Supaul.
7. The Popularly Election Mukhiya of Gram Panchayt- Charne, Anchal, Chhatapur, District-Supaul.
8. The Chairman, Panchayat Teachers Selection Committee -cum- Sukh Suvidha Committee, Charne, Anchal-Chhatapur, District-Supaul through its Secretary, namely, Secretary of Gram Panchayat- Charne, Anchal-Chhatapur, District-Supaul.
9. The Secretary of Gram Panchayt-Charne, Anchal-Chhatapur, DistrictSupaul. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Amrit Abhijat, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Birju Prasad, G.P. 13 and M/S. Ravi Kumar, Amresh and Ashok Kumar, A.C. to G.P. 13.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner has sought for quashing of the order dated 10.01.2008 contained in Letter No. 04-2 issued by the respondent no. 9, the Secretary of Gram Panchayat, Gram Panchayat-Charne, Anchal- Chhatapur, District-Supaul, cancelling the selection of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.6792 of 2011 (3) dt.11-07-2017 2/2 petitioner as a Panchayat Teacher with effect from 10.01.2008. Taking into account that there is statutory remedy available, therefore, the petitioner is directed to file an appeal before the District Appellate Authority within a period of thirty days from the date of the order which should be disposed of in accordance with law within the statutory period. Learned counsel for the petitioner further relied upon a judgment of this Court rendered in the case of Ribha Rani Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors, reported in PLJR 2009(2), 867, and submitted that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the said judgment.
With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ application stands disposed of.
(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U