Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43576/2016bail granted

Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-22Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43576 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -153 Year- 2016 Thana -KATEYA District- GOPALGANJ ====================================================== Manoj Yadav Son of Jogendra Yadav, Resident of village Ranipur, P.S. Kateya , District Gopalganj.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalan Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 22-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 29.06.2016 in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 153 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 272/273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(A) of the Excise Act and Section 57 of New Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the two seizure list witnesses being not the residents of the same village creates doubt about the seizure list.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 153 of 2016, with the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43576 of 2016 (2) dt.22-10-2016 (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure to do so on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT U T