Laddu Tanti @ Laddu Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39214 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2019 Thana- JAGDISHPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Laddu Tanti @ Laddu Mandal, Male, aged about 38 years, Son of Naresh Tanti Resident of Village- Yogiveer, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Samir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ramesh Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 92 of 2019 registered for offences under sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

In the present case, the police has recovered 10 liters of country made liquor (Mahua) from the lane near to the house of the petitioner. An allegation has been made that the petitioner, on seeing the police party, fled away from there leaving the bag with country made liquor in the lane. Looking to the quantity of illegal liquor recovered, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39214 of 2019(2) dt.27-06-2019 2/2 from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional District & Sessions Judge-cum- Spl. Judge, Excise, Bhagalpur in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 92 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled. (Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T