Deepak Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42354 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-251 Year-2021 Thana- CHERIYA BARIYARPUR DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== DEEPAK YADAV Son of Bishun Yadav Resident of - Aure, Ward no. 13, Panchayat- Basahi, P.S- Cheria Bariyarpur, Dist- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kundan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 307, 379, 354(B), 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a young boy of 20 years of age and the informant alleges that the accused persons, including the petitioner, armed with deadly weapons came to her house asking about the whereabouts of her grandson and threatened to kill him or would commit gang rape of the informant, it is next alleged that the accused persons, thereafter threw the informant on the ground and disrobed her, thereafter

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42354 of 2022(2) dt.22-09-2022 2/3 this petitioner is alleged to have assaulted her with farsa on head causing injury and the accused persons also assaulted her son causing injury.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that no reason or motive has been assigned for an occurrence, it is next submitted that even the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature, as would be evident from Annexure-2 series to the anticipatory bail application, the learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner is a young boy aged about 20 years and, in the event, if he is sent to custody his entire career would get jeopardized and chances are bright that he may come in contact with hardened criminal.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42354 of 2022(2) dt.22-09-2022 3/3 (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Cheria Bariyarpur P.S. Case No. 251 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T