Neel Bhushan Kumar v. The State Bank Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15908 of 2021 ====================================================== Neel Bhushan Kumar Son of Sri Dwarika Prasad, Resident of VillageMakhapa, P.O.Dakara, Police Station-Makhdumpur, District-Jehanabad at Present residing at Ward no 17, Chandpur Bela, Anil Bhawan Gali P.S. Jakkanpur District-Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Bank of India through Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna. 2.

The Deputy General Manager-Cum-Appellate Authority, State Bank of India, Zonal Office, Judges Court Road, Patna. 3.

The Regional Manager-Cum-Disciplinary Authority, State Bank of India, Regional Office, Sasaram, District-Rohtas.

4.

The Chief Manager-cum-Enquiry Officer, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Patna.

5.

The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Nokha Branch, District-Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sanjiv Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 18-01-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this is an application for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ/writs setting aside the speaking order dated 31.3.2020 contained in memo no.RBO/SSM/01 issued by Regional Manager-cum-Disciplinary Authority by which punishment of dismissal without notice has been

Patna High Court CWJC No.15908 of 2021(2) dt.18-01-2024 2/2 inflicted on the petitioner in terms of paragraph no.6(a) of the memorandum of settlement of disciplinary action for workman dated 10.4.2002 and or to grant any other relief or reliefs for which petitioner is legally entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U