Aditya Kumar @ Yash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41541 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-271 Year-2022 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria ====================================================== Aditya Kumar @ Yash Kumar, Son Of Santosh Chaudhary Resident Of Village- Kanhaiya Chak, P.S.-Parbatta, Distt.- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 09-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 271 of 2022 dated 17.06.2022 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 325, 307, 353, 427, 436, 188 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act, 1984.
3. The prosecution case, in short is that on the alleged date of occurrence, 23 named accused persons including the petitioner and 175 unknown accused persons damaged the vehicles plying on road as well as destroyed the articles of the shopkeepers and assaulted the public against the policy of appointment of Agnipath Scheme. It is also alleged that they also entered inside the Block office and damaged the door and window of old block of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41541 of 2025(2) dt.09-07-2025 2/2 Nagar Panchayat.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that F.I.R. has been lodged against 23 named accused persons including the petitioner and 175 unknown persons. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner rather the allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus. Lastly, it has been submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedents.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest / surrender of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today, in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 271 of 2022, he will be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Khagaria subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Khatim Reza, J) premchand/- U T