Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21006 of 2011 ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar S/O Shri Prayag Mahto Resident Of Village & P.OMalpur, Via- Meghaul, Police Station- Khodawandpur, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Education Officer, Samastipur.

5. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Samastipur.

6. The Deputy District Programme Officer (Eastblishment), Samastipur.

7. The Then District Superintendent Of Education, Samastipur (now post is abolished).

8. The Sub Divisional Education Officer, Rosera, District- Samastipur (now post is abolished.)

9. The Block Education Officer, Rosera, District- Samastipur.

10. The Chairman, Rosera Nagar Panchayat, Block Rosera, DistrictSamastipur.

11. The Executive Officer, Rosera Nagar Panchayat, Block Rosera, DistrictSamastipur.

12. The Member, District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Samastipur.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-08-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ application as the same has become infructuous.

Permission is accorded.

The writ application stands dismissed as being infructuous.

Patna High Court CWJC No.21006 of 2011 (6) dt.30-08-2017 2/2 Regarding non-payment of salary for the period the petitioner worked, if so advised, he may prefer an application before the District Appellate Authority, Samastipur. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U