← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1732/2021allowed

Ranju Kumari @ Kanchan Kumari v. Vivekanand Singh

2024-09-12Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1732 of 2021 ====================================================== Ranju Kumari @ Kanchan Kumari Wife of - Vivekanand Singh, Daughter of Bridge Singh, Resident of Village - Gorasara, P.s. - Ramgarh, DistrictKaimur (Bhabua) at present resident of village Araila P.s. Bagen, DistrictBhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

Vivekanand Singh Son of Narendra Singh Resident of Village - Gorasara, P.s. Ramgarh, District- Kaimur (Bhabua).

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prabhat Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parwej Khan, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 12-09-2024 Heard the parties.

2. This is an application for transfer of Matrimonial Case No. 73 of 2020 (Vivekanand Singh v. Ranju Kumari) from the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Kaimur (Bhabhua) to the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhojpur.

3. Pursuant to the last order the sole Opposite Party has appeared. The lady has assigned the reasons in paragraphs 12 and 13 of the petition which read as follows:- "12 That the petitioner has strong doubt that if she goes to Bhabhua court, then her life is in danger.

13. That petitioner's parents reside in Ara and they are old persons, therefore, she is not able to go along at Bhabhua, so she could not appeard in the said Matrimonial

Patna High Court MJC No.1732 of 2021(3) dt.12-09-2024 2/2 case."

4. Learned counsel for the Opposite Party submits that he has no objection to this transfer but he may be allowed to appear either physically or through video conferencing.

5. The prayer/submission is just and proper, if the case is to be transferred, the husband also must get opportunity to appear either physically or through video conferencing.

6. In that background, M.J.C. No. 1732 of 2021 is allowed. Let the files of Matrimonial Case No. 73 of 2020 (Vivekanand Singh v. Ranju Kumari) is transferred from the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Kaimur (Bhabhua) to the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhojpur at Ara, with permission to both the parties either to appear physically or through the video conferencing. (Rajiv Roy, J) perwez U