Suraj Nat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39890 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-798 Year-2024 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Suraj Nat S/o Deo nat Resident of village-Bangara, Police Station- Daudpur, District-Saran 2.

Sunil Nat @ Tamnna Nat S/o Basant Nat Resident of village-Bangara, Police Station- Daudpur, District-Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Mili Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 26-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 798 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 310(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, six unknown persons on three motorcycles intercepted the informant and on the point of pistol snatched his gold chain worth Rs. 1,20,000/- and fled away from the place of occurrence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39890 of 2025(2) dt.26-06-2025 2/3 incriminating material have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners also submits that the petitioners are not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioners have transpired in this case on the basis of their own confession before the police in connection with Rivilganj P.S. Case No. 390 of 2024 and the same has got no evidentiary value. It is further submitted that no T.I. parade has been conducted in this case. The petitioners are in custody since 27.01.2025. Petitioner no. 1 has got seventeen criminal antecedents in which he is on bail in sixteen cases and petitioner no. 2 has got fifteen criminal antecedents in which he is on bail in fourteen cases.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Let the petitioners be released on bail after framing of charge, if not already framed on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39890 of 2025(2) dt.26-06-2025 3/3 below/concerned Court in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 798 of 2024, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioners.

(II) The petitioners shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.

(III) If the petitioners are found involved in similar nature of offence in future, the Trial Court will have the liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.

(IV) If the petitioners tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T