Basudeo Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42516 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2005 Thana- NAUTAN District- West Champaran ====================================================== BASUDEO RAM Son of Ramnath Ram Resident of Village - Bhana Chak, P.s.- Majhaulia, Distt.- West Champaran, at Present Posted on the Post of Panchayat Secretory (Chanpatiya Block), P.s.- Chanpatiya, Distt.- Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajendra Narayan, Sr. Adv Mr. Akhileshwar Kumar Shrivastva, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-11-2022 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects within four weeks.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered in connection with Nautan (Jagdish Purr), Case No.86 of 2005, for the offence punishable under sections 420, 465, 468, 406 and 509 of IPC.

Allegedly, the petitioner misappropriated government funds.

It is submitted by learned senior counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and have committed no offence.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42516 of 2022(2) dt.29-11-2022 2/2 He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. He further submits that the anticipatory bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected in Cr. Misc. No.39700 of 2007 dated 28.08.2007 by a co-ordinate bench of this Court, thereafter the petitioner has moved for anticipatory bail before this Court. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail by submitting that earlier the anticipatory bail of the petitioner was rejected by a co-ordinate bench of this Court with a liberty to surrender and pray for regular bail in the learned court below. He further submits that the petitioner has not surrendered till date and again pray for anticipatory bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner named above on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected.

This instant application is dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T