Anuj Thakur v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42523 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2025 Thana- Kasar District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== 1.
Anuj Thakur S/o Shri Thakur, R/o Vill.- Masodha, P.S. - Kasar, District - Sheikhpura 2.
Naveen Kumar S/o Shri Thakur, R/o Vill.- Masodha, P.S. - Kasar, District - Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rina Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 09-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Kasar P.S. Case No. 39 of 2025 dated 07.04.2025 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 126(1), 115, 76, 118(1), 303(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 3 (5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on the alleged date of occurrence, petitioners along with other accused persons were digging the land of the informant. On protest made by the informant, they assaulted her by fists and slap. It is alleged that the petitioners assaulted on the head of the informant by means of iron rod, as a result, she sustained head injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42523 of 2025(2) dt.09-07-2025 2/2 petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties. Counter case bearing Kasar P.S. Case No. 40 of 2025 has been lodged by Radhima Devi against the informant. There is a land dispute between the parties due to which the present case and counter case have been lodged. It is further submitted that as per the injury report, injury no. 1 of the informant is simple in nature and injury no. 2 is grievous in nature. Lastly, it has been submitted that petitioners have no criminal antecedents.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest / surrender of the petitioners within a period of six weeks from today, in connection with Kasar P.S. Case No. 39 of 2025, they will be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1st Class, J.M., Sheikhpura subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
(Khatim Reza, J) premchand/- U