Pintu Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.42703 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Pintu Yadav, Son of Shaligram Yadav.

2. Shaligram Yadav, Son of Wakil Yadav, Both are R/o Village- Ram Nagar, P.S.- Pirpainti, District- Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anupa Nand Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-08-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Pirpainti P.S. Case No. 181 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is that they along with other accused persons entered into the house of the informant and assaulted the informant causing injury to him. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is case and counter case between the parties and no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioners.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42703 of 2018 (3) dt.01-08-2018 2/2 the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M-XI at Bhagalpur, in connection with Pirpainti P.S. Case No. 181 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T