Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43406/2017dismissed

Pravin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-16Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43406 of 2017 (4) dt.16-10-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43406 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -143 Year- 2017 Thana -NANHPUR District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Pravin Kumar Son of Parmanand Thakur resident of Village - Majhaur, Ward No. 2, Police Station - Nanhpur, District - Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ramesh Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-10-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Nanhpur P.S. Case No. 143 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 363, 364 and 120(B) of Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner and other is of killing the son of the deceased.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and save and except last seen theory, there is nothing against the petitioner so as to implicate the petitioner. It has also been submitted that in fact the deceased died due to drowning as he had gone to buy wine from Nepal for his marriage and because of checking by the police, he changed root and tried to cross the river, in which he drowned.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43406 of 2017 (4) dt.16-10-2017 Further it has also been submitted that though it is alleged that deceased had some injury on his person, however, the said injuries might have caused by the stones that were in the said river. Learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that there is strong suspicion against the petitioner that he along with other accused persons have killed the deceased and the person of the deceased had some injury on his neck.

Having heard both sides, considering the fact and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation, at this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail, his application for regular bail is, accordingly, rejected.

However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T