Ram Murti Kumar @ Rohit v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31864 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -188 Year- 2017 Thana -SHEKHPURA District- SEKHPURA ====================================================== Ram Murti Kumar @ Rohit Son of Arjun Chauhan, Resident of Village - Mudhari, P.S. - Harnaut, District - Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Dhurendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 29.05.2017 in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 188 of 2017 for the offences alleged under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated as the first information report is against unknown person. The stolen motorcycle in question has been recovered from Mani Ram Baba Akhada, Biharsharif, Nalanda and not from the conscious possession of the petitioner, who claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 188 of 2017 with the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31864 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Ibrar U T