← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9919/2024disposed

Sanjay Pratap Tiwary v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-29Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9919 of 2024 ====================================================== Sanjay Pratap Tiwary Son of Sri Lalan Tiwari resident of New Sidhauli, P.S.- Dalmiya Nagar, District- Rohtas (Sasaram).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, The Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Commissioner, Patna Range, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas (Sasaram).

4.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Dehri, Rohtas (Sasaram). 5.

The Superintendent of Police, Rohtas (Sasaram). 6.

The Station House Officer, Dalmiya Nagar Police Station, Dalmiya Nagar, Rohtas (Sasaram).

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mrityunjay Kumar Tiwary, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ramadhar Singh, GP-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 29-07-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That the present writ application is being filed for a direction to the Respondents authority to grant Arms License (N.P. Bore Rifle) to the petitioner, by disposing of the application filed by the petitioner and his representation dated 07.05.2024, before the Licensing Authority, which has not been considered despite the recommendation after verification of his application for Arms License because grant of License is necessary for the protection of life and liberty and protection of own property with social

Patna High Court CWJC No.9919 of 2024(2) dt.29-07-2024 2/2 status of the petitioner."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks a direction upon the Respondent No. 3 i.e. the District Magistrate, District-Rohtas at Sasaram, to dispose off the application, filed by the petitioner, for grant of arms license on 14.7.2014.

3.

Per contra, the learned counsel for the Respondent-State submits that in case, the petitioner has filed an application for grant of arms license and the same is still pending, it shall be disposed off, within a fixed time frame.

4.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and proper to direct the Respondent No. 3, to consider the application, filed by the petitioner, for grant of arms license, in case the same has actually been filed and is still pending and pass a reasoned and a speaking order, within a period of six weeks of receipt / production of a copy of this order.

5.

The writ petition stands disposed off on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U