Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26579/2016bail granted

Dilip Mahaldar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-07-12Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26579 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -286 Year- 2000 Thana -PURNEA SADAR District- PURNIA ====================================================== Dilip Mahaldar Son of Late Manik Chand Mahaldar, Resident of village - Belouri Satev, P.S.- Sadar ( Muffassil ), District - Purnea .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh,Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sri Uday Chand Prasad,A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 12-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 414 and 364 of the Indian Penal Code. It is contended that the alleged recovery is from the ply mill of Manoj Bhagat. Petitioner is not named in the first information report but allegedly on the basis of statement made by Pawan Kumar Yadav as well as Devanand Yadav he has been implicated in this case. It is contended that the aforesaid witnesses have said nothing regarding the petitioner during the course of trial in which Basuki Bhagat has been acquitted of the charges. It is further contended that Manoj Bhagat has already been granted bail. Petitioner is in custody since 09.03.2016. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26579 of 2016 (2) dt.12-07-2016 2/2 petitioner, namely, Dilip Mahaldar is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in Sadar P.S. Case No. 286/2000.

Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation then the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Spd/- U T