← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43801/2024bail granted

Anil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-08Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43801 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2024 Thana- WARISNAGAR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Anil Yadav Son Of Sita Ram Yadav Village- Darsur, P.S.- Waris Nagar, Distt.- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anant Kumar Mishra, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Waris Nagar P.S. Case No. 60 of 2024 dated 28.02.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 414 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the co-accused persons are alleged to have committed theft of motorcycle for the purpose of selling.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation against the petitioner is that the co-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43801 of 2024(2) dt.08-07-2024 2/2 accused Shivnath Yadav has disclosed that he along with Balindra and Kishan had committed theft of motorcycle from Adarsh Nagar and carried the same for selling it to Anil Yadav (Petitioner) on consideration money of Rs. 25,000/-. The recovery has been made from the joint conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 29.02.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner and the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Samastipur, in connection with Waris Nagar P.S. Case No. 60 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Jyoti/- U T