Ram Ratan Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41754 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-269 Year-2014 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

Ram Ratan Das, aged about 30 years, male, Son of Ram Sagar Das 2.

Ram Sagar Das aged about 55 years, male, Son of Ram Sevak Das 3.

Chunnu Paswan, aged about 40 years Son of Lakshman Paswan All resident of Village-Birauli, Police Station-Pupari, District-Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 08-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 149, 341, 342, 186, 283 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Pupari P.S. Case No. 269 of 2014.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated and the FIR is against 20 named accused persons and 50100 unknown persons. No specific overt act has been alleged against the petitioners, who claim clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners' arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupari in connection with Pupari P.S. Case No. 269 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. and with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41754 of 2019(2) dt.08-07-2019 2/2 further conditions -- (i) That one of the bailors of each of the petitioners shall be their close relatives.

(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioners shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (iv) That the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Vikash Jain, J) BT/- U T