Savita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52074 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-295 Year-2020 Thana- BARHARA KOTHI District- Purnia ====================================================== SAVITA DEVI W/O UGRANARAYAN MANDAL R/o village- Nathpur, Gurhyari, P.S.- Barhara (Raghuvansh Nagar), District- Purnia ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bidhu Ranjan, Mr. Saurav Anand For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 04-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Barhara P.S. Case no. 295 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 302, 504, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

As per allegation in the FIR, while the informant and his parents were sowing paddy in the filed, some co-accused persons asked them to shop the agricultural work. On protest made by the informant's father, accused persons started to assault him brutally. When the informant came to save his father, he was also beaten up by them. On the order of Dinesh

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52074 of 2021(2) dt.04-07-2022 2/3 Mandal, co-accused Julis Mandal and Saurav Mandav fired on the father of the informant, which hit him on his hand and leg resulting into his serious condition and in the way to hospital he died.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Specific allegation of firing is against Julis Mandal and Saurav Mandal and of order giving is Dinesh Mandal. General and omnibus allegation has been levelled against this petitioner. Due to admitted land dispute several members of a family were implicated in this case including the petitioner. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of her arrest or surrender in connection with Barhara P.S. Case no. 295 of 2020, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Purnia subject to the conditions as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52074 of 2021(2) dt.04-07-2022 3/3 laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U