Himanshu Ram @ Himanshu Kumar @ Priyanshu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44124 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-704 Year-2023 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.
HIMANSHU RAM @ HIMANSHU KUMAR @ PRIYANSHU KUMAR SON OF RANVIJAY YADAV VILLAGE- LAKHAWAR, P.S.- GHOSHI, DISTT.- JEHANABAD 2.
SUDHANSHU KUMAR SON OF RANVIJAY YADAV VILLAGELAKHAWAR, P.S.- GHOSHI, DISTT.- JEHANABAD ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Amrendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-08-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 12.11.2023, his wife was giving fodder to the animal, when Himanshu came and started abusing the informant, on protest, he ran towards his house, calling Sudhanshu, who came with an iron rod along with other family members, thereafter, Sudhanshu assaulted the wife of the informant by an iron rod, causing injury near her eyes and Himanshu also assaulted his wife by an iron rod,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44124 of 2024(2) dt.07-08-2024 2/2 further Rupam and Devrani Devi also assaulted his wife. The learned counsel submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case. It is further submitted that the instant case has been instituted after a delay of four days, which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution and the petitioners are students, as would manifest from Annexure-4 to the anticipatory bail application, and prima facie, no offence in the nature of allegation is made out under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Ghoshi P.S. Case No.704/2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T