Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41462/2026bail granted

Hare Ram Sah @ Hare Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-03Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41462 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2025 Thana- BALIYA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Hare Ram Sah @ Hare Ram S/O Late Sahdeo Sah @ Late Sahdev Sah R/O Village - Mathurapura, Ward No.- 6, P.S- Ballia (Balliya )District Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ballia (Balliya) P.S. Case No. 88 of 2025, instituted for the offences under Sections 30(a), 32(2) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, read with Sections 8(a)(c) and 21 of the NDPS Act. 3.

This is the second attempt of the petitioner for bail. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail which was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated 12.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 51740 of 2025 taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and recovery of contraband beyond commercial quantity coupled with embargo under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41462 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026 2/2 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 18.03.2025 without any rhymes or reason and has got no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that charge has already been framed against the petitioner on 08.04.2026 but no any witness has been examined in this case.

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Ballia (Balliya) P.S. Case No. 88 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T