Lalu Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25299 of 2016 (3) dt.09-08-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.25299 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -77 Year- 2016 Thana -ALOULI District- KHAGARIA ======================================================
1. Lalu Yadav son of Hari Narayan Yadav
2. Ranjit Sada Son of Puso Sada Both residents of Village Larhi, Police Station Allauli, District Khagaria.
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Viveka Nandsingh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sri Anant Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the Informant and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners are in custody in connection with Allauli P.S.Case No.77 of 2016 registered for an offence under Sections 341, 385, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
As per the prosecution case, it is alleged by the informant that on 28.03.2016 at 3.00 P.M., the informant was walking on the road in front of house, then all the accused persons came on the motorcycle and threatened him to mange the case of Bhago Devi otherwise, the result will be very bad and further demanded Rs.5,00,000/- as Rangdari and after that accused Lalu Yadav took out pistol from his waist, pushed the informant and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25299 of 2016 (3) dt.09-08-2016 with an intention to kill him.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 29.03.2016. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the case. Though there is an allegation of firing in course of occurrence but none have sustained injuries, hence no offence under Section 307 of the IPC is made out. Other Sections are bailable. There is admitted enmity between the petitioner and the informant.
On behalf of the State and counsel for the Informant, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the FIR. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Khagaria, in connection with Sessions Trial No.109 of 2016 arising out of Allauli P.S.Case No.77 of 2016. (Sudhir Singh, J) B.Kr./- U T