Sooraj Ray And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.35495 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -336 Year- 2017 Thana -ARA NAGAR District- BHOJPUR ======================================================
1. Sooraj Ray Son of Chandeshwar Ray,
2. Ranjan Kumar Son of Umesh Ray, Both are R/o Village- Manachak, P.S.- Koilawar, District- Bhojpura (Ara).
3. Kunal Kumar Son of Late Bahadur Shashtri, R/o Village- Jamalpur, P.S.- Kiolawar, District- Bhojpur (Ara).
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 30-08-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Ara (Town) P.S.Case No.336 of 2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 414 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner as per FIR is that the petitioners were apprehended along with the stolen motorcycle. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that as a matter of fact they have purchased the same from the co-accused but he has not provided them papers and further they have clean antecedent and they are in custody for more than two months.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35495 of 2017 (4) dt.30-08-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Ara, Bhojpur in connection with Ara (Town) P.S.Case No.336 of 2017. With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court. In the event of failure on their part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T