Patna High CourtCR. REV./371/2006dismissed

Parmottam Prasad Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-09-29Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No.371 of 2006 ===========================================================

1. Parmottam Prasad Singh

2. Sarwottam Prasad Singh Both sons of late Jai Mangal Singh, resident of village Ganaili, P.S. Tarapur, Distt. Munger, at present 46B, Shrikrishnapuri, Patna -1. (1st Parties) (Opposite Parties)/ Petitioners.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Vidya Nand Yadav, son of late Rateneshwar Prasad, resident of village Chakheli, P.S. Sangrampur, Distt. Munger.

3. Shrimati Nunia Devi, wife of Shankar Singh

4. Anandi Singh, son of late Chamru Singh

5. Birendra Kumar, son of late Basudeo Singh

6. Smt. Bataso Devi, wife of Bijo Singh All resident of village Hasanpur, P.S. Tarapur, Distt. Munger.

7. Shrimati Rekha Devi, wife of Tilakdhari Singh

8. Shailendra Singh, son of late Tarui Singh Both residents of village Ganaili, P.S. Tarapur, Distt. Munger. .... ... (IInd Party)(Petitioners) Opposite Parties 2nd set. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Adv. Mr. Akhileshwar Singh, Adv.

Mr. Kundan Kumar, Adv.

For the State : Mr. A.P.P. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 29-09-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State. The Petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 22.2.2006 by which the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Munger, in Cr. Revision No. 187 of 2005, set aside the order dated 25.5.2005 by which the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Tarapur, had converted a Proceeding under Section 144 Cr. P.C. to one under Section 145 Cr.

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.371 of 2006 dt.29-09-2015 2/2 P.C. in Case No. 112 of 2005.

Considering that the Proceeding is of the year 2005 and these Provisions are for emergent purposes only, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter at this late stage.

Hence, the application stands dismissed.

The Petitioner is directed to agitate their cause before an appropriate Forum if cause so arises.

(Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T