Sri Kant Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
Patna High Court CWJC No.22207 of 2011 dt.29-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22207 of 2011 =========================================================== Sri Kant Singh Son of Late Hrgovind Singh Resident of Village - Tiuri, P.S. Manpur, District - Nalanda .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The District Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif
3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Nalanda at Biharsharif
4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Biharsharif, District - Nalanda
5. The District Supply Officer, Biharsharif, District - Nalanda
6. The Block Development Officer, Biharisharif, District - Nalanda
7. The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation Ltd., Mogal Kuan, Biharisharif, District - Nalanda
8. The Panchayat Secretary, Tirui Panchayat, Bihar Block, District - Nalanda .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. ALOK KUMAR SINHA- I For the Respondent/s : Mr. Hari Mohan Mishra, AC to GP 27 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 29-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the notice dated 25.06.2011 issued by the Block Development Officer, Biharsharif by which the petitioner has been directed to deposit rest amount of undistributed food grains lifted under the SGRY Scheme.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Enquiry Commission headed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Udai Sinha (Retired) has now submitted its report and any further action in relation to recovery of the value of undistributed rice under the SGRY Scheme would abide by the decision of the State Government to be taken on the basis of such report.
Patna High Court CWJC No.22207 of 2011 dt.29-10-2018
4. In the above view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach this Court afresh as and when the occasion arises in future.
5. Having regard to the stand of the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
6. Let the authorities refrain from taking coercive measures against the petitioner until decision is taken by the State Government, as aforesaid.
(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 02.11.2018 Transmission Date NA