Prahlad Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

Patna High Court CWJC No.14456 of 2011 dt.09-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14456 of 2011 =========================================================== Prahlad Singh S/O Late Mathura Singh R/O Vill.- Basatpur, Ward No. 15, P.S.- Motihari, Distt.- East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The Collector, East Champaran, Motihari, East Champaran

4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, East Champaran, Motihari

5. The Block Development Officer, Motihari Sadar, East Champaran

6. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Ram Singh Chhatauni, Distt.- East Champaran

7. The Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Ram Singh Chhatauni, Distt.- East Champaran .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. SANGEET DEOKULIAR, ADV For the Respondent/s : None =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 09-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 05.03.2011 issued by the Block Development Officer, Motihari by which the petitioner has been directed to deposit rest amount of undistributed food grains lifted under the SGRY Scheme.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the orders of this Court, the Enquiry Commission headed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Udai Sinha (Retired) has now submitted its report and any further action in relation to recovery of the value of undistributed rice under the SGRY Scheme would abide by the decision of the State Government to be taken on the basis of such report.

Patna High Court CWJC No.14456 of 2011 dt.09-10-2018

4. None appears on behalf of the respondents, when the matter is called.

5 In the above view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach this Court afresh as and when the occasion arises in future.

6. Having regard to the stand of the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

7. Let the authorities refrain from taking coercive measures against the petitioner until decision is taken by the State Government, as aforesaid.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 25.10.2018 Transmission Date NA