Bhartiya Upbhogta Sangrakchhan Samiti v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14791 of 2015 With Interlocutory Application No. 2182 of 2016.

====================================================== Bhartiya Upbhogta Sangrakchhan Samiti, through, Dr. Sanjiv Bharati, Son of Sri Sitaram Mahton, Resident of Phulwariya-3, Kailibari (Kalisthan), Barauni, Begusarai- 8511113 .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Inspector General of Registration, Department of Registration, Government of Bihar, Secretariat, Patna800001

2. The District Collector-Begusarai, Government of Bihar, Zila Samaharnalay, District- Begusarai, Bihar

3. The District Registrar, Begusarai, Department of Registration, Government of Bihar, Zila Samaharnalay, District- Begusarai, Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravindra Kr. @ Ravindra Kr. Rai, Advocate. For the State: Mr. Amrindra Kumar, Advocate. For the Intervenors: Mr. Abhimanyu Vatsa, Mr. Sudhanshu Trivedi and Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocates.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 24-03-2017 The question of attachment of Barauni Circle to the District Registration Office, Begusarai and the consequential inconvenience that may be caused to the people living in Barauni Circle is an administrative and executive decision to be taken by the administrative authorities based on the policy decision and administrative consideration of the department and the Writ Court, in absence of there being any statutory violation or constitutional

Patna High Court CWJC No.14791 of 2015 (3) dt.24-03-2017 2/2 breach, is not required to look into these aspects of the matter. The issue involved in this Writ Petition being a policy decision of the State, the same should be taken on the administrative side. The petitioner may ventilate his grievance before the competent statutory authority or the administrative authorities and it would be for the administrative authorities to look into the grievance of the petitioner and take such steps as may be permissible under law for redressal of the grievance of the petitioner.

The Writ Petition and the Interlocutory Application stand disposed of with the aforesaid liberty to petitioner and intervenor.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) Dilip, AR U