Naresh Yadav @ Ram Naresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42086 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-246 Year-2025 Thana- BACHHWARA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Naresh Yadav @ Ram Naresh Yadav S/O Late Deo Narayan Yadav Resident of Village - Chak Karima, Ward no.- 09, P.S - Bachhwara, Dist- Begusarai (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Uzma Sultan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-07-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Ms. Uzma Sultan and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 308(3), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that children were playing cricket and the ball went inside the house of the petitioner on account of which, the female members got enraged and altercation took place and petitioner assaulted Amit with axe causing injury on head.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42086 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 2/3 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant on account of dispute relating to playing of cricket. It is next submitted no doubt petitioner is alleged to have assaulted Amit with gandasa causing injury on head but then the injury has been found to be simple in nature and the blow is not alleged to have been repeated though Amit suffered three injuries i.e., on head, nose and left parietal region, but then the petitioner is alleged to have assaulted on head. It is also submitted that if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted, the petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bachhawara P.S. Case No. 246 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42086 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 3/3

7. However, it is made clear that if the Investigating Officer of the case files an application before the learned Trial Court bringing to notice that petitioner despite giving assurance to this Court is not cooperating in the investigation in that event, the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after recording reasons. (Satyavrat Verma, J) rajesh/- U T