Patna High CourtCWJC/1058/2011disposed

Paras Nath Pandey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-06-22Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1058 of 2011 ====================================================== Paras Nath Pandey, son of Late Ram Raj Pandey, Resident of Village and P.O- Dighwalia, Police Station- Raghunathpur, District- Siwan, at Present Posted and working as an Assistant Teacher in Govt. Basic SchoolRasulpur, Anchal -Ekmas, District- Saran(Chapra) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Divisional Education Establishment Committee through Its Chairman, the Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran Division at Chapra.

4. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran Division at Chapra.

5. The District Education Officer, Siwan.

6. The District Education Officer, Chapra, District- Siwan.

7. The District Education Officer, Gopalganj

8. The District Superintendent of Education, Siwan.

9. The District Superintendent of Education, Chapra, District- Saran.

10. The District Superintendent Of Education, Gopalganj

11. The District Magistrate, Siwan.

12. The Deputy Development Commissioner- Cum- Chairman, DistrictEducation Establishment Committee, Siwan.

13. The District Treasury Officer, Siwan.

14. The Headmaster cum Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Govt. Basic School-Rasulpur, Anchal-Ekma, District- Saran (Chapra.) .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Girija Shankar Prasad, GP-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 22-06-2018 Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed.

In view of the above, the writ application has become infructuous and it is, accordingly, disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- U