Tuntun Lal Das @ Ravindra Lal Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.623 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -369 Year- 2016 Thana -NARPATGANJ District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Tuntun Lal Das @ Ravindra Lal Das, son of Late Shiv Narayan Lal Das, resident of Village- Madhura South, Police Station- Narpatganj, DistrictAraria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Suresh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-07-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Narpatganj P.S.Caase No.369 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 143, 341, 323 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there is allegation against the petitioner and others that the accused persons drove the deceased and also assaulted; due to which he died, however, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the post mortem report shows no injury and regarding viscera report, a report was called. It is also submitted that there is no eye witness of the occurrence and he is in custody for 6.11.2016. Further submission is that the other co-accused were also named in the F.I.R., who have been

granted bail by this Court vide order dated 28.3.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No.10027 of 2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Araria, in connection Narpatganj P.S.Case No.369 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/-

U