Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49242/2018bail granted

Kisundev Das @ Bhutka Das @ Krishndev Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-27Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49242 of 2018 (3) dt.27-09-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49242 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -252 Year- 2016 Thana -KATORIA District- BANKA ====================================================== Kisundev Das @ Bhutka Das @ Krishndev Ravidas S/o Kaleshwar Das, R/o Vill.- Laharniya, P.S.- Suiya, District- Banka. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Anita Kumari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Katoria (Suiya) P.S. Case No. 252/2016, registered for the offences punishable under Section 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation is committing murder of father of informant. It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. F.I.R. is against unknown. During investigation, the name of petitioner surfaced in this case on the basis of suspicion. Except suspicion, there is no incriminating material against this petitioner.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49242 of 2018 (3) dt.27-09-2018 of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ist, Banka in connection with Katoria (Suiya) P.S. Case No. 252/2016, subject to the conditions:

(1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bonds.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T