Ritik Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42275 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-263 Year-2022 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Ritik Yadav, Son Of Sri Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar Resident Of Village- Naya Tola, Police Station- Danapur, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 354, 379, 504, 506, 509 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of two cases and informant alleges that on 12.04.2022 at 7.30 A.M. when informant went out of the house for going to her college when petitioner asked her to sit inside the car and further, hurled abuses and when the informant refused to sit, she was made to sit forcefully. Thereafter, petitioner snatched her mobile and assaulted her with slaps and thereafter, it is alleged that she was pushed outside the car.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42275 of 2022(2) dt.12-12-2022 2/3 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that earlier also the present informant had instituted Danapur P. S. Case No.580 of 2021 (Annexure-2) in which the petitioner was granted bail and the matter was compromised also. It is next submitted that petitioner and the informant are neighbours and are in love with each other, but on account of parental pressure, the informant instituted the case against the petitioner. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that the allegation does not inspire confidence as it is alleged that she was made to sit in the car, thereafter, she was slapped and then let off the car. It is next submitted that the petitioner and the informant still chat with each other and in support whereof, a whats-app chat has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner which is taken on record.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the anticipatory bail application.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, is directed to be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42275 of 2022(2) dt.12-12-2022 3/3 released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Danapur P. S. Case No.263 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T