Sudhan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49354 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -269 Year- 2017 Thana -BELA District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Sudhan Paswan, Son of Birendra Paswan, resident of Village- Narnga, P.S.- Bela, Dist.- Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bela P.S.Case No. 269 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 Arms Act. Allegation as per F.I.R. against the petitioner is that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. rather one Pramod Jha, who is named in the F.I.R. and earlier he had threatened the father of the informant to face dire consequences and ultimately the father of the informant was shot dead.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and no T.I.P. has been held

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49354 of 2018 (3) dt.03-10-2018 2/2 and the petitioner has no criminal history and he is in custody 05.05.2018.

Heard learned A.P.P also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Bela P.S.Case No. 269 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:- i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T