Aditya Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40435 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-333 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Aditya Kumar Singh S/o Late Yogendra Singh R/o Village- Renukut Sonbhadra, P.S.- Pipari Chauki Hondalko, District- Sonhadra (U.P.) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 26-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 333 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32(i)(iii), 41(i)(iii) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, 14.220 liters liquor was recovered from scooty and the petitioner was apprehended on spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40435 of 2025(2) dt.26-06-2025 2/2 no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is not the owner of the scooty in question. The petitioner has taken lift from the scooty driver and he has got no knowledge with regard to the nature of goods loaded in the vehicle in question. The petitioner is in custody since 13.05.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 333 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T