Prahlad Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39395 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2025 Thana- KAUWAKOL District- Nawada ====================================================== Nitish Kumar Son of Om Prakash Resident of Village -Mannpur Tola -Ammatari ,P.S- Kauwakol Distt- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 40494 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2025 Thana- KAUWAKOL District- Nawada ====================================================== PRAHLAD KUMAR Son of Saryug Saw Resident of Village - Mananpur, P.S.- Kauwakol, District - Nawada (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 39395 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Indradeo Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 40494 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ahmad Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Kauwakol P.S. Case No. 94 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 117(3), 118(2), 352, 351(3), 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. The allegation against petitioner no. 1, Nitish Kumar, is that he assaulted the informant on his left hand with iron rod. The allegation against petitioner Prahlad Kumar, is that he assaulted the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39395 of 2025(3) dt.29-08-2025 2/2 informant on his leg with lathi, as a result of which, the injuries sustained are grievous in nature.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. It is further submitted that the injury inflicted upon the injured persons is found to be simple in nature.
5. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the injuries suffered by the injured are grievous in nature. Both the petitioners have criminal antecedents.
6. In my view, the petitioners do not deserve the privilege of bail, which is hereby rejected.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T