Patna High CourtCWJC/15252/2011disposed

Md.Qayum v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-09-19Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15252 of 2011 =========================================================== Md. Qayum S/O Late Md. Hassan R/O Village- Manoharpur, P.S.- Manihari, District- Katihar .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, Katihar

3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Katihar

4. The Programme Officer, Manihari, Katihar

5. The Block Development Officer, Manihari, Katihar

6. The Block Supply Officer, Manihari, Katihar .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhola Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents : None =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order contained in letter no. 641 dated 11.08.2011 issued by the Programme Officer, Manihari whereby the petitioner has been directed to pay Rs. 2,52,080/- i.e. value of 184 quintals of food grains under SGRY for the year 2001-02 to 2004-05.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the orders of this Court, the Enquiry Commission headed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Udai Sinha (Retired) has now submitted its report and any further action in relation to recovery of the value of undistributed rice

Patna High Court CWJC No.15252 of 2011 dt.19-09-2018 2/2 under the SGRY Scheme would abide by the decision of the State Government to be taken on the basis of such report.

4. In the above view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach this Court afresh as and when the occasion arises in future.

5. Having regard to the stand of the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

6. Let the authorities refrain from taking coercive measures against the petitioner until decision is taken by the State Government, as aforesaid.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 04.10.2018 Transmission Date N.A.