Patna High CourtCWJC/20030/2011disposed

Dayawati Sinha @ Dayamanti Sin v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-04Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.20030 of 2011 dt.04-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20030 of 2011 =========================================================== Dayawati Sinha @ Dayamanti Sinha wife of Late Anandi Kumar, Resident of Dhekapur, Block-Islampur, P.S.-Khudaganj, Distt.-Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar.

2. Dy. Development Commissioner, Nalanda.

3. The Block Development Officer-Islampur, Distt.-Nalanda. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate. Mr. Dhananjay Nath Tiwari Miss. PreetyKunwar, Advocates.

For the Respondents : Ms. Nutan Kumar Sharma, AC to GA-1 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 04-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 25.06.2011 issued under Memo No. 1139 by the Block Development Officer, Islampur directing for realization of price at APL rate of the rice remained with the petitioner supplied in the year 200106 to 2006-07 under SGRY Scheme.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the orders of this Court, the Enquiry Commission headed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Udai Sinha (Retired) has now submitted its report and any

Patna High Court CWJC No.20030 of 2011 dt.04-10-2018 further action in relation to recovery of the value of undistributed rice under the SGRY Scheme would abide by the decision of the State Government to be taken on the basis of such report.

4. In the above view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach this Court afresh as and when the occasion arises in future.

5. Having regard to the stand of the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

6. Let the authorities refrain from taking coercive measures against the petitioner until decision is taken by the State Government, as aforesaid.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 08.10.2018 Transmission Date N.A.