Patna High CourtCWJC/21676/2011disposed

Sabina Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-04Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.21676 of 2011 dt.04-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21676 of 2011 =========================================================== Sabina Khatoon W/O Vakil Mian Resident Of Village- Bagahi Baghambarpur, Bairiya, P.S- Bairiya, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary (Food), Bihar At Patna.

2. The Collector, West Champaran, Bettiah.

3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Bettiah, West Champaran.

4. The District Supply Officer, West Champaran at Bettiah.

5. The Sub Divisional Officer, Bettiah, West Champaran.

6. The Block Development Office, Bettiah, West Champaran. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. Raj Ballabh Pd. Yadav, AAG-XI =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 04-10-2018 As none appeared on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was passed over for a few cases. However on repeat call, the petitioner was again not represented.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for setting aside the notice issued under Memo No. 131 dated 29.05.2010 (Annexure-P2) by the Block Development Officer, Bairiya (R6) mechanically under the dictate of the respondent no. 3 and 5 directing refund of value of undistributed rice under Sampurna Gramin Rojgar Yojna (SGRY) from the year 2007 at the rate of Rs. 13.70 Per Kg. totaling a sum of Rs. 2,63,000/-.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents appears and states that pursuant to the orders of this Court, the Enquiry Commission headed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Udai Sinha (Retired) has

Patna High Court CWJC No.21676 of 2011 dt.04-10-2018 now submitted its report and any further action in relation to recovery of the value of undistributed rice under the SGRY Scheme would abide by the decision of the State Government to be taken on the basis of such report.

4. Having regard to the stand of the respondents, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 10.10.2018 Transmission Date N.A.