Patna High CourtCWJC/15444/2014disposed

Baban Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-07Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15444 of 2014 ====================================================== Baban Prasad Singh Son of Shree Daroga Singh, Assistant Teacher, Smt. Uma Pandey Ram Lakhan Das Project Girls High School, Harpur Karah, P.S. Baniapur, District- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, New Secretariat, Vikas Bhawan, Patna

2. The Director (Secondary Education), Education Department, Bihar Secondary Education Office, Budh Marg, Patna

3. The Deputy Director (Secondary Education) In Charge Project Schools, Education Department, Bihar Secondary Education Office, Budh Marg, Patna

4. The District Education Officer, Saran at Chapra ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bijay Kumar Pandey For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sc19-Ajay Bihari Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 07-08-2018

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is covered by the decision of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 12531 of 2014 which was disposed of on 26.07.2018.

3. He submits that the case of the petitioner is similar to the case of Maheshwar Prasad Singh, and similar other cases i.e. C.W.J.C. No. 13159 of 2015 order dated 22.2.2015 and C.W.J.C. No. 12531 of 2014 order dated 26.7.2018 and petitioners of those cases were granted relief by

Patna High Court CWJC No.15444 of 2014(2) dt.07-08-2018 2/2 the respondent. If the case of the petitioner is similar to that of Maheshwar Prasad Singh case, the respondents are required to grant same relief to the petitioner in the light of litigation policy 2011 and judgment of the full Bench reported in 2018 (2) PLJR

929. Final decision on the claim of the petitioner may be taken by the respondent in the light of decision of C.W.J.C. No. 12531 of 2014 and other cases mentioned therein within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order.

4. With the aforesaid the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) banti/-T.Kr.