Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38300/2017bail granted

Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-08-23Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38300 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -115 Year- 2016 Thana -RAGHOPUR District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Manoj Yadav, son of Mishri Lal Yadav, resident of Village- Patarghatti, Police Station- Triveniganj, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Veena Kumari Jaiswal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No.115 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 392, 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing robbery.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that nothing specific has been attributed to the petitioner and nothing has been recovered from his possession and co-accused persons having similar allegation have been granted bail in Cr.Misc.No. 45132 of 2016, vide order dated 18.10.2016 and petitioner is in custody since 2.4.2017 having clean antecedent. Heard learned APP also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38300 of 2017 (3) dt.23-08-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and considering the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Birpur, in connection with Raghopur P.S.Case No. 115 of 2016, subject to the conditions :- (i) One of the bailors should be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court concerned, (ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and appear in court on each and every date fixed in the case, failing which his bail bond shall be cancelled, (iii) If active involvement of the petitioner in such type of cases is found in future, the prosecution shall move for cancellation of his bail bond.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U