← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50723/2018dismissed

Jailor Yadav @ Vikram Yadav @ Vikash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-07Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50723 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2018 Thana- KAKO District- Jehanabad ====================================================== JAILOR YADAV @ VIKRAM YADAV @ VIKASH YADAV Son of Bachhu Yadav, resident of Village- Basantpur Harahar, P.S.- Kako (Bhelawar), District- Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Smt Sangeeta Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 07-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner,, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner seeks bail in Kako (Bhelawar) P.S. Case No. 75 of 2018, instituted for the offence under Section(s) 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

In the written report, there is specific allegation against this petitioner of causing fire arm injury to the daughter of informant , namely Puja Kumari who died on account of aforesaid injury.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that this petitioner has also been assaulted by the informant's side and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50723 of 2018(7) dt.07-12-2018 2/2 he has sustained injury. In support of said submission, learned counsel has annexed the injury report of petitioner as Annexure-3 to the bail petition.

Learned counsel for the informant has submitted that petitioner has criminal antecedent. He is still giving threat to commit overt act after being released on bail. In the written report, there is direct allegation against this petitioner of causing firearm injury to daughter of the informant who subsequently died on account of such injuries. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected at this stage.

Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. Petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after six months in the event no substantial progress is made in the trial. (Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T