Pappu Yadav @ Pappu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42473 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2019 Thana- KAKO District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.
PAPPU YADAV @ PAPPU KUMAR S/O Kamta Yadav Resident of villageRasula, P.O. Paigambarpur, P.S. Kako (Bhelawar O.P.), District- Jehanabad. 2.
Munna Yadav @ Munna Kumar S/O Ram Binay Yadav @ Ram Binay Prasad Yadav Resident of village- Rasula, P.O. Paigambarpur, P.S. Kako (Bhelawar O.P.), District- Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ajay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-10-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Kako (Bhelawar) P.S. Case No. 63 of 2019, disclosing offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners is of firing on the son of informant.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that though there is allegation of firing, however, from the F.I.R, itself, it is evident that nobody has received any injury and they have falsely been implicated in this case due to land dispute between the parties.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42473 of 2019(4) dt.25-10-2019 2/2 Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, this application is allowed. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Jehanabad, in connection with Kako (Bhelawar) P.S. Case No. 63 of 2019, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T