Sudhir Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2586 of 2017 (3) dt.21-09-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.2586 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1 Year- 2016 Thana -MAHILA PS District- JEHANABAD ======================================================
1. Sudhir Sharma Son of Late Deoki Sharma, R/o Village- Sikhpura, P.S.- Ghosi( O.P. Okari) in the District of Jehanabad. .... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Navin Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-09-2017 Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to make necessary correction in para -1 of the petition. Permission is granted.
Heard the parties.
The appellant seeks regular bail in connection with Jehanabad Mahila P.S.Case No.01 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 376, 511, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(x) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Act) Act.
Allegation against the appellant is of trying to commit rape upon the informant and further allegation is that on hulla, neighbours assembled and there and they also tried to catch the appellant.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2586 of 2017 (3) dt.21-09-2017 Submitted of the learned counsel for the appellant is that he has been falsely implicated in this case as no such occurrence has taken place and the Additional S.P., Jehanabad in his supervision note has also doubted the occurrence. Charge sheet has been submitted at the instance of the S.P. of Jehanabad. The appellant is in custody since 27.7.2017.
Heard learned Special P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail.
Having heard both sides in view of allegation made in the FIR, I am not inclined to grant bail to the appellant, however, the appellant may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case.
With the above observation, this appeal is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T